2003 Hyundai Matrix vs. 2012 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2012 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. At 1,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Hyundai Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Hyundai Matrix (104 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2012 Daihatsu Sirion. (69 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 2012 Daihatsu Sirion.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Hyundai Matrix (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Daihatsu Sirion. (94 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Hyundai Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Hyundai Matrix | 2012 Daihatsu Sirion | |
Make | Hyundai | Daihatsu |
Model | Matrix | Sirion |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1606 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |