2003 Isuzu Ascender vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2003 Isuzu Ascender is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Isuzu Ascender is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Isuzu Ascender (282 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu Ascender should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 2003 Isuzu Ascender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu Ascender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Isuzu Ascender | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Isuzu | Sunbeam |
| Model | Ascender | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 5300 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2190 mm |
