2003 Isuzu Axiom vs. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
To start off, 2003 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Isuzu Axiom (212 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP @ 3450 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu Axiom should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer (316 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Isuzu Axiom. (313 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Isuzu Axiom.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Isuzu Axiom | 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
| Model | Axiom | Grand Wagoneer |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 4980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3450 RPM |
| Torque | 313 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2800 mm |
