2003 Jaguar R-D6 vs. 1963 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 (230 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar R-D6 weights approximately 1070 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Jaguar R-D6 | 1963 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
| Model | R-D6 | Seven |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2720 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 29 L |
