2003 Jaguar R-D6 vs. 1994 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 (230 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1994 Ford Falcon. (205 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Falcon weights approximately 35 kg more than 2003 Jaguar R-D6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 (500 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm). This means 2003 Jaguar R-D6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar R-D6 | 1994 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | R-D6 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2003 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2720 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 357 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2800 mm |