2003 Jaguar R-D6 vs. 2005 Toyota Opa
To start off, 2005 Toyota Opa is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar R-D6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar R-D6 would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar R-D6 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2005 Toyota Opa.
Because 2005 Toyota Opa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Jaguar R-D6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Opa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar R-D6 | 2005 Toyota Opa | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | R-D6 | Opa |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2720 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2160 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |