2003 Jaguar R-D6 vs. 2009 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2009 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar R-D6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar R-D6 would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 (230 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2009 Saab 03-Sep. (207 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar R-D6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 (500 Nm) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Saab 03-Sep. (221 Nm). This means 2003 Jaguar R-D6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar R-D6 | 2009 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Jaguar | Saab |
Model | R-D6 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2720 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 500 Nm | 221 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 70 L |