2003 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1962 Zastava 750

To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,099 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (157 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 950 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (196 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750. 2003 Jaguar X-Type has automatic transmission and 1962 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1962 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jaguar X-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: