2003 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (126 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 405 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (331 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar X-Type | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
Model | X-Type | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 331 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |