2003 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (390 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 317 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (443 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar X-Type | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | X-Type | 200 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 443 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.2:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1502 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |