2003 Jaguar X-Type vs. 1996 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Subaru Outback (165 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (157 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2003 Jaguar X-Type.
Because 1996 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Subaru Outback (221 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (196 Nm). This means 1996 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jaguar X-Type.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar X-Type | 1996 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Jaguar | Subaru |
Model | X-Type | Outback |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2099 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 196 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.6 mm | 99.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.8 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2530 mm |