2003 Jaguar X-Type vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2003 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (206 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (194 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile should accelerate faster than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 75 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (244 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jaguar X-Type.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Jaguar X-Type | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | X-Type | Profile |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 194 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2880 mm |
