2003 Jaguar X-Type vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar X-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar X-Type would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (157 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2003 Jaguar X-Type.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz C is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz C will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar X-Type | 2006 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | X-Type | C |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2099 cc | 3497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 157 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 202 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.1 seconds | 6.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.3 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 62 L |