2003 Jaguar X-Type vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar X-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar X-Type would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (202 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2003 Jaguar X-Type.
Because 2003 Jaguar X-Type is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar X-Type (244 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Jaguar X-Type | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | X-Type | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.6 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 7.3 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |
