2003 Jaguar X-Type vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar X-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar X-Type would be higher. At 2,099 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar X-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK (198 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (157 HP @ 6800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar X-Type weights approximately 80 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK (310 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. (196 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jaguar X-Type. 2003 Jaguar X-Type has automatic transmission and 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK has manual transmission. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jaguar X-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Jaguar X-Type | 2013 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | X-Type | SLK |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2099 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 157 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 196 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4350 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.6 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.8 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.1 seconds | 6.6 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4134 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2006 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1303 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.7 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
