2003 Jaguar XF vs. 1962 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XF weights approximately 320 kg more than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar XF | 1962 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XF | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7000 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1740 mm |