2003 Jaguar XF vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XF weights approximately 525 kg more than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 2003 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar XF | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | Jaguar | MG |
Model | XF | 1100 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7000 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1350 mm |