2003 Jaguar XF vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 750 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Jaguar XF | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Jaguar | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | XF | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7000 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1530 mm |
