2003 Jaguar XF vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XF weights approximately 145 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar XF | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XF | 626 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7000 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1440 mm |