2003 Jaguar XF vs. 2009 Zenvo ST1
To start off, 2009 Zenvo ST1 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XF would be higher. Both 2003 Jaguar XF and 2009 Zenvo ST1 are equipped with a 7,000 cc engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Zenvo ST1 weights approximately 26 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Jaguar XF | 2009 Zenvo ST1 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Zenvo |
| Model | XF | ST1 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 7000 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 1104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1376 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4665 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2041 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1198 mm |
