2003 Jaguar XF vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XF would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 365 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XF.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Jaguar XF | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
| Model | XF | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7000 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4138 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2103 mm |
