2003 Jaguar XF vs. 2013 Lexus RX
To start off, 2013 Lexus RX is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XF would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lexus RX weights approximately 620 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XF.
Because 2013 Lexus RX is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lexus RX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Jaguar XF | 2013 Lexus RX | |
| Make | Jaguar | Lexus |
| Model | XF | RX |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7000 cc | 211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1885 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1695 mm |
