2003 Jaguar XJ vs. 1964 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Jaguar XJ | 1964 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | XJ | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 2968 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 293 Nm | 33 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2060 mm |
