2003 Jaguar XJ vs. 1972 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Monteverdi 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Monteverdi 2000 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 255 kg more than 1972 Monteverdi 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar XJ | 1972 Monteverdi 2000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Monteverdi |
Model | XJ | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 82 L |