2003 Jaguar XJ vs. 1979 Subaru Coupe

To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Subaru Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Subaru Coupe would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1979 Subaru Coupe. (71 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1979 Subaru Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 680 kg more than 1979 Subaru Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Subaru Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Subaru Coupe. (125 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Subaru Coupe.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Jaguar XJ 1979 Subaru Coupe
Make Jaguar Subaru
Model XJ Coupe
Year Released 2003 1979
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 1780 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 294 HP 71 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 411 Nm 125 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1615 kg 935 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2470 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]