2003 Jaguar XJ vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 175 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jaguar XJ. (293 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar XJ | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Jaguar | Lancia |
Model | XJ | Nea |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 293 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2590 mm |