2003 Jaguar XJ vs. 2005 Renault Megane

To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 155 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XJ.

Because 2003 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (101 Nm). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications: