2003 Jaguar XJ vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XJ.
Because 2003 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9000 (350 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jaguar XJ. (293 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jaguar XJ.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar XJ | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Saab |
Model | XJ | 9000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 293 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1545 kg | 1590 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2710 mm |