2003 Jaguar XJ vs. 2005 SsangYong Korando

To start off, 2005 SsangYong Korando is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2005 SsangYong Korando. (139 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2005 SsangYong Korando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 240 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XJ.

Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Korando (307 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jaguar XJ. (293 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jaguar XJ. 2003 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2005 SsangYong Korando has manual transmission. 2005 SsangYong Korando will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Jaguar XJ 2005 SsangYong Korando
Make Jaguar SsangYong
Model XJ Korando
Year Released 2003 2005
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2968 cc 2874 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 240 HP 139 HP
Engine RPM 6800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 293 Nm 307 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 2250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 22.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1545 kg 1785 kg
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2490 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 72 L