2003 Jaguar XJ vs. 2009 Volkswagen Eos

To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (240 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2009 Volkswagen Eos. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2009 Volkswagen Eos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 45 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XJ.

Because 2003 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (293 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volkswagen Eos. (200 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volkswagen Eos. 2003 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2009 Volkswagen Eos has manual transmission. 2009 Volkswagen Eos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Jaguar XJ 2009 Volkswagen Eos
Make Jaguar Volkswagen
Model XJ Eos
Year Released 2003 2009
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2968 cc 1984 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 240 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6800 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 293 Nm 200 Nm
Torque RPM 4100 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 82.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 92.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 11.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1545 kg 1590 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 55 L