2003 Jaguar XJ vs. 2012 Honda Accord

To start off, 2012 Honda Accord is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XJ (294 HP) has 146 more horse power than 2012 Honda Accord. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Accord.

Because 2003 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Accord. (350 Nm). This means 2003 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Accord. 2003 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2012 Honda Accord has manual transmission. 2012 Honda Accord will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: