2003 Jaguar XK vs. 1980 Mazda 929

To start off, 2003 Jaguar XK is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XK weights approximately 583 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XK (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 365 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Jaguar XK 1980 Mazda 929
Make Jaguar Mazda
Model XK 929
Year Released 2003 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4196 cc 1970 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 390 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 6150 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 525 Nm 160 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.1:1 8.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1735 kg 1152 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2620 mm