2003 Jaguar XK vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XK weights approximately 222 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Jaguar XK | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | XK | Countryman |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 393 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 47 L |