2003 Jeep Liberty vs. 2004 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 2004 Mazda Laputa is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Liberty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Liberty would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Liberty (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Laputa.
Because 2003 Jeep Liberty is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mazda Laputa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Liberty (320 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Laputa. (61 Nm). This means 2003 Jeep Liberty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Laputa.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Jeep Liberty | 2004 Mazda Laputa | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Liberty | Laputa |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 60.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2370 mm |
