2003 Kia Opirus vs. 1976 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2003 Kia Opirus is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Kia Opirus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Kia Opirus (196 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Kia Opirus should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Kia Opirus weights approximately 800 kg more than 1976 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1976 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Kia Opirus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Kia Opirus (295 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2003 Kia Opirus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 1300. 2003 Kia Opirus has automatic transmission and 1976 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1976 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Kia Opirus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: