2003 Kia Retona vs. 1962 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2003 Kia Retona is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Kia Retona (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Kia Retona should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Kia Retona weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Kia Retona | 1962 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Kia | Lotus |
| Model | Retona | Elite |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1216 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2240 mm |
