2003 Kia Retona vs. 1981 Zastava 132
To start off, 2003 Kia Retona is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Kia Retona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2003 Kia Retona. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 2003 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Kia Retona weights approximately 775 kg more than 1981 Zastava 132.
Because 2003 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Kia Retona (205 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Kia Retona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Kia Retona | 1981 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Kia | Zastava |
Model | Retona | 132 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2560 mm |