2003 Kia Sephia II vs. 1948 Riley RM A
To start off, 2003 Kia Sephia II is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Kia Sephia II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Riley RM A weights approximately 180 kg more than 2003 Kia Sephia II.
Because 1948 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Kia Sephia II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Kia Sephia II | 1948 Riley RM A | |
Make | Kia | Riley |
Model | Sephia II | RM A |
Year Released | 2003 | 1948 |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2870 mm |