2003 Kia Sephia II vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2003 Kia Sephia II is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Kia Sephia II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Kia Sephia II (79 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Kia Sephia II should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Kia Sephia II weights approximately 89 kg more than 1997 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Kia Sephia II (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Kia Sephia II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Kia Sephia II | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Kia | Mazda |
| Model | Sephia II | Midge |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1322 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
