2003 Kia Shuma vs. 1962 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 2003 Kia Shuma is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Lancia Flavia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lancia Flavia (101 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Kia Shuma. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lancia Flavia should accelerate faster than 2003 Kia Shuma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lancia Flavia weights approximately 58 kg more than 2003 Kia Shuma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Kia Shuma | 1962 Lancia Flavia | |
Make | Kia | Lancia |
Model | Shuma | Flavia |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 42 L |