2003 Kia Shuma vs. 2004 Westfield ZEI
To start off, 2004 Westfield ZEI is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Kia Shuma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Kia Shuma would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Kia Shuma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield ZEI (174 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2003 Kia Shuma. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield ZEI should accelerate faster than 2003 Kia Shuma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Kia Shuma weights approximately 422 kg more than 2004 Westfield ZEI.
Because 2004 Westfield ZEI is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Westfield ZEI. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Kia Shuma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Kia Shuma | 2004 Westfield ZEI | |
Make | Kia | Westfield |
Model | Shuma | ZEI |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1092 kg | 670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2340 mm |