2003 Kia Shuma vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Kia Shuma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Kia Shuma would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2003 Kia Shuma. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2003 Kia Shuma.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Kia Shuma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Kia Shuma. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Kia Shuma.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Kia Shuma | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | Shuma | BT-50 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.4 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3010 mm |