2003 Kia Visto vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2003 Kia Visto is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Volvo 220 (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2003 Kia Visto. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Volvo 220 should accelerate faster than 2003 Kia Visto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Volvo 220 weights approximately 215 kg more than 2003 Kia Visto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Kia Visto. (73 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1962 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Kia Visto.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Kia Visto | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Kia | Volvo |
| Model | Visto | 220 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 73 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2610 mm |
