2003 Lada 110 vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lada 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lada 110 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Lada 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lada 110 (77 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lada 110 (116 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Lada 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Lada 110 | 2009 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Lada | Renault |
| Model | 110 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 77 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 50 L |
