2003 Lada 2123 vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz B
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lada 2123. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lada 2123 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B (108 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2003 Lada 2123. (77 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B should accelerate faster than 2003 Lada 2123.
Because 2003 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mercedes-Benz B. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz B (250 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Lada 2123. (134 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Lada 2123.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Lada 2123 | 2012 Mercedes-Benz B | |
| Make | Lada | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 2123 | B |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1690 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 77 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4359 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1557 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2699 mm |
