2003 Lada 2123 vs. 2013 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2013 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lada 2123. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lada 2123 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Transit Connect (134 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2003 Lada 2123. (77 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Transit Connect should accelerate faster than 2003 Lada 2123. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 264 kg more than 2003 Lada 2123. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford Transit Connect. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Transit Connect (174 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Lada 2123. (134 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Transit Connect will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Lada 2123. 2013 Ford Transit Connect has automatic transmission and 2003 Lada 2123 has manual transmission. 2003 Lada 2123 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Transit Connect will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lada 2123 | 2013 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Lada | Ford |
Model | 2123 | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 2003 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1690 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1589 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2113 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2911 mm |