2003 Lada Calina 1118 vs. 1988 Lada 2105
To start off, 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lada Calina 1118 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1988 Lada 2105.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lada Calina 1118 | 1988 Lada 2105 | |
Make | Lada | Lada |
Model | Calina 1118 | 2105 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.3 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.4 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |