2003 Lada Calina 1118 vs. 2011 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2011 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lada Calina 1118. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lada Calina 1118 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lada Calina 1118. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lada Calina 1118 | 2011 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Lada | Saab |
Model | Calina 1118 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4646 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2675 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 62 L |