2003 Lada Calina 1118 vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lada Calina 1118. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lada Calina 1118 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lada Calina 1118 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 877 kg more than 2003 Lada Calina 1118.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Lada Calina 1118. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lada Calina 1118 | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Lada | Jeep |
Model | Calina 1118 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 285 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1957 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 85 L |