2003 Lada Niva vs. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2003 Lada Niva is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 771 kg more than 2003 Lada Niva.
Because 2003 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud has automatic transmission and 2003 Lada Niva has manual transmission. 2003 Lada Niva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Lada Niva | 1962 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Lada | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Niva | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1688 cc | 6223 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 91.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 137 km/hour | 187 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1981 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 81 L |
